
This Sunday, as well as bringing unseasonable snowfall across Britain saw the Olympic torch arrive on our shores. And what a debacle it’s procession through the streets of London turned out to be. I am stunned at the scenes that I saw yesterday and it has made me despair anew at the ever-murky world of politics while the poor hard working athletes see their big moment crumbling into farce before their eyes,
No-one doubts that China does not have the best human right record, and further does not use it’s considerable influence where it could, in places like Darfur, to the good. But is this a new thing? A recent stain on the conscience of China’s history? No it isn’t. The obvious question to me would seem to be, Why were they allowed to compete for the honour of holding the Olympics in the first place if their human rights record or any other aspect of their modus operandi was going to cause such consternation? Their assurances, at the time that they were awarded the games that they would put things right obviously meant next to nothing. Are we really to believe that no one foresaw the scenes of protest that seem to being gaining strength across the world in the wake of the famous torch? Why would it not make more sense to make a prerequisite of holding the Olympic Games, a clean bill of health on human rights? Considering the enormous cache that accompanies the honour and, we are told, equally desirable upturn in economy and opportunity for the host, it might even be a way of presenting to some countries the incentive to clean their act up. God knows that nothing else seems to work!
File Type: Video
At that time, Hitler wanted to sort of legitimize the Nazi movement, something similar the Chine4se are doing today. For them the Olympics is an opportunity to sell and establish the Chinese Superpower.
As they use to say in my history class, "The most important lesson in History is that people never learn from History."
Meanwhile, the brands of today, the sponsors of the Olympics continue to sully their hands with blood and injustice.
Why does it sound so shocking now? There is a problem with the country that is hosting the games, the problem is not local but something that strikes deep in to the conscious of mankind all across the globe.
Sympathizing with the athletes is all right because many, especially from the poorer nations like Ethiopia or say even India which is not so poor but has widespread unemployment to make a living out of sports. But it is a small, very small cause to defend when it comes to sacrificing a bigger cause as the liberation of a country from a brutally oppressing country run by sadist communists with scant regards for their own people.
As far as the plight of the Darfur refugees are concerned, I won’t be surprised if China had not heard about it before Spielberg’s act.
As far as your question on why China was allowed to hold the event in the first place then I must tell you that politics take back seat when it comes to making money.
Again, when I think about the Tibet issue, how better the protesters can draw the world attention to what is now a forgotten struggle? The Olympics coincide with 50 years of oppression in Tibet.
The sad thing is that an event for a global noble cause is being tarnished but perhaps that's the only option left. In any case the event has always been used by host governments to propel their ideology and agendas since the days of Hitler.
That way the Chinese must pay obeisance to the Japanese and the Japanese Empire got China rid of the corrupt Qing government and installing railroads. Why do they continuously seek apology from the Japs for the atrocities they have committed like in Nanking?
It's the same thing that the Chinese are doing in Tibet. Tibet doesn't belong to China. It is an illegal occupation of a country.
China has not refrained from shooting and killing over a 100 protesters despite the fact that it is desperate not to show its evil face before the Olympics are over. I am afraid that these protests and show of solidarity with the Tibetans now will harm their cause even more. It will boomerang back to them.
My support for Tibet shall continue in the future as it has been in the past.
Local Opinions (0)
Global Opinions (13)
At that time, Hitler wanted to sort of legitimize the Nazi movement, something similar the Chine4se are doing today. For them the Olympics is an opportunity to sell and establish the Chinese Superpower.
As they use to say in my history class, "The most important lesson in History is that people never learn from History."
Meanwhile, the brands of today, the sponsors of the Olympics continue to sully their hands with blood and injustice.
Why does it sound so shocking now? There is a problem with the country that is hosting the games, the problem is not local but something that strikes deep in to the conscious of mankind all across the globe.
Sympathizing with the athletes is all right because many, especially from the poorer nations like Ethiopia or say even India which is not so poor but has widespread unemployment to make a living out of sports. But it is a small, very small cause to defend when it comes to sacrificing a bigger cause as the liberation of a country from a brutally oppressing country run by sadist communists with scant regards for their own people.
As far as the plight of the Darfur refugees are concerned, I won’t be surprised if China had not heard about it before Spielberg’s act.
As far as your question on why China was allowed to hold the event in the first place then I must tell you that politics take back seat when it comes to making money.
Again, when I think about the Tibet issue, how better the protesters can draw the world attention to what is now a forgotten struggle? The Olympics coincide with 50 years of oppression in Tibet.
The sad thing is that an event for a global noble cause is being tarnished but perhaps that's the only option left. In any case the event has always been used by host governments to propel their ideology and agendas since the days of Hitler.
That way the Chinese must pay obeisance to the Japanese and the Japanese Empire got China rid of the corrupt Qing government and installing railroads. Why do they continuously seek apology from the Japs for the atrocities they have committed like in Nanking?
It's the same thing that the Chinese are doing in Tibet. Tibet doesn't belong to China. It is an illegal occupation of a country.
China has not refrained from shooting and killing over a 100 protesters despite the fact that it is desperate not to show its evil face before the Olympics are over. I am afraid that these protests and show of solidarity with the Tibetans now will harm their cause even more. It will boomerang back to them.
My support for Tibet shall continue in the future as it has been in the past.
Home











RSS 













